To set the story straight from the outset: I listen to NPR each morning and evening on my commute to and from work, to get an idea of what's happening outside my own little world. I rarely watch the morning or evening news, and it's hit-or-miss whether I'll read any news stories on the web during the day. NPR is well-written and -edited, and their reporters are very, very good at what they do.
That said --
I've always known that NPR was quite liberal in its leanings; doesn't surprise me, and I listen to the news stories with a grain of salt, to balance their spin against my personal beliefs (which may or may not match the spin of the day, depending on which day it is). A story this morning, though, reminded me once again just how far left NPR's writers actually are. The piece was on Bush declining to speak at the NAACP convention, currently being held in Milwaukee. The first few lines spoke of Bush never speaking at one of the NAACP meetings as a standing president, and of his being the only president in the last 70 years not to do so. Of course, the inevitable statistics came up -- Bush garnered only 10% of the African-American vote in the 2004 election, ad nauseum. That was fine -- so far, only facts had come up in the story. Then came the quotes from the NAACP representatives: (to paraphrase) "I don't know why he doesn't want to speak to us -- he wants to forget that we are some of the people he's president over as well."
Since when did the NAACP speak for every black (I detest the splintering of America into "African-Americans" and "Latino-Americans" and so on) person out there? One of the main ideas of the story was that since Bush didn't speak to the NAACP conventioneers, he didn't speak to any blacks at all. I didn't realize that to be black in America, you had to sympathize with the NAACP. It would be somewhat analogous (in the south) to the KKK stating that since Bush hadn't made the keynote address at their annual meeting, he was refusing to speak for the white population. I'm not comparing the NAACP and KKK in an equal light; however, both are extremely political groups who take themselves quite seriously. As an American, free to think and act in the ways I see fit, I have contempt for those who attempt to compartmentalize humanity into groups.
One of the key issues in the NPR piece was the "polarization of America" with respect to race. I thought the Republican National Party leader, who did speak to the NAACP, made a good point in harking back to the aforementioned statistics about the 2004 election and stating that the Democrats are currently benefiting much more than Republicans from the lopsidedness of the black vote. This whole polarization issue refuses to die -- in the south, we see it so often, but I don't believe it's limited to my area; it's just out in the open here, rather than closeted behind supposedly open-minded doors.